by Admin. | Jan 28, 2014 | Health Care Reform, Health Exchanges, Individual Exchanges, PPACA, SHOP Exchanges, State Exchanges
States Pushing Back Against Smaller Networks
From Kaiser Health News:
Officials in at least a half dozen states are pushing back against health plans in the new insurance markets that limit choice of doctors and hospitals in a bid to control medical costs.
The plans don’t start offering coverage until January but they’re facing regulatory action, possible legislation, and in at least one case involving a high-profile children’s hospital, litigation.
The pushback against “narrow” provider networks recalls the backlash against managed care and health maintenance organizations in the 1990s. Protests from consumers and hospitals eroded those attempts to restrain expenses by narrowing provider networks.
Now criticism of limited networks has risen as consumers realize that, despite President Barack Obama’s pledge that they could keep their doctors, their Affordable Care Act insurance may not include the physicians or hospitals they’ve been seeing.
The critique feeds into the politically damaging outcry over the millions of people whose health plans were cancelled. It’s unclear whether the limited choice of doctors and other providers will be as much of a concern to uninsured people who will be gaining subsidized coverage through the state-based marketplaces.
Still regulators and elected officials in a few states have already forced changes. Others are weighing legislation that could expand the networks. Legal fights are brewing. In some cases, the officials are responding to complaints of health care systems or providers that were excluded.
In Maine, state regulators prohibited Anthem BlueCross BlueShield from switching some customers to a network sold through the Affordable Care Act’s marketplace that excluded six of the state’s hospitals.
In Washington State, the insurance commissioner initially banned several health plans from the online exchange for what he called inadequate caregiver networks. Some of the plans have broadened networks; the dispute continues with others.
In New Hampshire Anthem’s 2014 marketplace plans exclude more than a third of the state’s hospitals. Lawmakers have written legislation that would force insurers to expand choice.
Anthem will “use the excuse, ‘Well, we’re going to save money by having a narrow network,’” said State Rep. Bill Nelson, a Republican who sponsored the bill pendingin the New Hampshire legislature. “Sure that could happen for some people, but other people are going to be losers. Imagine having to change the doctor you’ve had for years.”
South Dakota, Pennsylvania and Mississippi are discussing measures similar to Nelson’s, known as “any-willing-provider” laws that would force insurers to accept more participants in the networks.
Broader choice comes with a price. The ability to sell less-expensive plans with limited choices of doctors and hospitals helps contain medical inflation, health economists argue. Looser networks could. mean higher prices.
“We had narrow networks in the ‘90s. Health-care prices not only moderated, but actually there was one year where they fell,” said Northwestern University professor David Dranove, who specializes in the health care industry. “Then we had the HMO backlash and we had broad networks [again], and health care prices went through the roof.”
In a typical narrow network, offered in many states under the new ACA rules, caregivers agree to lower prices in expectation of more patients. Insurers pass some of the savings to consumers. Done correctly, limited networks can also save money because family doctors, specialists and hospitals who are all part of the same network do a better job of coordinating care, many health policy experts believe.
Excluding certain hospitals from Anthem’s New Hampshire narrow plan would allow premiums to be 25 percent lower than they otherwise would have been, a company spokesman said. Anthem’s narrow Maine plan would save 12 percent, he said.
Insurers are supposed to compete side-by-side in the health law’s subsidized, online exchanges. Under the ACA, they must all now offer certain basic health benefits and they must cover anyone, regardless of pre-existing conditions.
On this new legal terrain, they compete by offering their best combination of price and providers directly to individuals and families who lack other coverage. Adjusting caregiver rosters is one of the few remaining ways insurers can lower costs, limited-network advocates say.
But others argue that these narrow networks can force patients to switch doctors or drive long distances for care if a key hospital is left out of the plan, especially in states such as Maine and New Hampshire with few insurers selling through the ACA marketplace.
“Whenever you have an extremely narrow network there are potential problems for patients with cancer and for patients with any chronic condition, particularly when it requires the patient to go out of network,” said Kirsten Sloan, senior director of policy for the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network.
Leaving a network to seek specialized care can lead to enormous out-of-pocket bills, she said.
In extreme cases networks could be too small to serve all the plan members they sign up.
“It’s no good making a narrow network that nobody can get in to see,” said Sander Domaszewicz, a senior benefits consultant at Mercer.
Insurers began unveiling ACA marketplace plans with narrow networks in recent months for coverage that starts in January 2014. Policymakers soon challenged them in several states, often pushed by excluded hospitals and their patients.
Maine Insurance Superintendent Eric Cioppa blocked Anthem from switching several thousand existing subscribers to a plan that excluded Central Maine Medical Center and partner doctors and hospitals. Anthem argued that shrinking its network would provide less-expensive but still high-quality care.
This summer Washington Insurance Commissioner Mike Kreidler blocked five insurers from selling through the exchange, in several cases because of network problems. One plan, he said, would have required people to drive nearly 50 miles to see a cardiologist and more than 100 miles to see a gastroenterologist.
Four plans protested Kreidler’s ban. Three reached settlements, some by adjusting networks. An administrative judge ruled in favor of another, Coordinated Care, whose network doesn’t include a children’s hospital.
Seattle Children’s Hospital, left out of networks including Coordinated Care’s, then sued Kreidler, alleging he failed to ensure adequate access to care.
In New Hampshire, Anthem’s decision to leave hospitals out of its network has prompted at least one to threaten litigation, and Nelson to introduce his bill. Anthem’s network could force some patients in his district to drive a dozen of miles or more to get routine care, he said
In few places has the fight over networks been fiercer than in Mississippi. BlueCross Blue Shield of Mississippi cancelled in-network contracts over the summer with Health Management Associates, a for-profit chain with 10 hospitals in the state.
Blue Cross isn’t selling insurance in 2014 through Mississippi’s federally run ACA marketplace, but many expect it to come on board later.
In response HMA took to the airwaves in protest and pitted the insurance commissioner, who wanted only four hospitals reinstated, against the governor, who ordered the insurer to take back all 10.
“I’ve been practicing law for 36 years and I have never seen as aggressive an effort to sway public opinion as these guys engaged in,” said David Kaufman, an outside lawyer for BlueCross BlueShield of Mississippi said of the hospital chain. “You could not go to your mailbox, pick up a newspaper, watch TV, listen to the radio or answer your home phone without hearing that Blue Cross is the devil.”
Blue Cross sued Gov. Phil Bryant, arguing the order was unconstitutional, noting that his daughter works for HMA’s law firm and pointing out that HMA is one of his top campaign contributors. Bryant backed off but ordered Insurance Commissioner Mike Chaney to hold hearings. He refused. Bryant and Cheney, both Republicans, have clashed repeatedly over the federal health law.
Now Mississippi, too, is talking about an any-willing-provider law, which typically requires insurers to take any hospital, clinic or doctor under terms accepted by other participants.
Such a rule would tell Blue Cross that “it can’t kick somebody out of the hospital of their choice,” HMA executive Paul Hurst told WFMN radio’s Paul Gallo on a show broadcast statewide.
But in any state, making every insurer accept every hospital, “is going to throttle competition,” said Dranove, the Northwestern professor who specializes in the health industry. “And this is a healthcare reform that depends entirely on competition. So the people who are fighting for broad networks… are ultimately fighting for the demise of Obamacare.”
Millennium Medical Solutions Inc. will continue to monitor and report on narrow net- work plans and other efforts by insurers to control costs in the PPACA environment.
by Admin. | Jul 1, 2011 | Newsletter
Healthcare Reform – Year Later
Hello. It’s been awhile, hope you’re all well. To all who have inquired, my thanks for your concern, but all’s good. Hectic, but good. Lot’s going on and an awful lot of travel. I’ve had a chance to meet and talk with with insurance carriers, Health Human Services, Trade Groups, Broker panels and most importantly customers with spirited opinions such as yourselves. It’s been a great time to learn, recharge and stay a bit too busy to write any meaningful posts. While staying busy appears to be the new constant, I’ll try to find something worthy to share on a more regular basis.
Before I get into it some news at MMS Corp:
Check our new www.medicalsolutionscorp.com this summer. We began the redesign and update of our web site to make it more user friendly and features packed with the following:
1-Quoting Module – The quoting engine will offer cross leading plans based on your location, income and employee total. Not all plans and carriers will participate and it is recommended that you get in touch with us.
2-Health Care Reform Section-this tab is dedicated to the new PPACA law.
3 Instant Chat – Scheduled Fall 2011
4. Social 2.0- Find us on Facebook, Linkedin and Twitter.
5. HR Log In- For clients only. Some of you have already begun using this online HR Kiosk. We’ve deployed this in partnership with HR Connect Technologies to offer employers tools for common HR tasks such as Benefit Plan Admin, Forms for new hires, terminations, work-site postings and employee record keeping. HR-Connect is a secure, HIPAA-compliant, Internet driven system designed to simplify your human resource department. Employees can review their own personal information, but not other employee’s data. Click Video Demo here and just ask us to set it up for your business at no charge!
MMS has also been speaking on Health Care Reform at various business groups and organizations. We have done talks at Small Property Owners of NY , Manhasset Republican Club and Greek Property Owners of NY.
Lastly, we have been appointed earlier in 2011 to the Empire Broker Advisory Council which consists of top 10 of 5000 brokers that meets throughout the year to discuss relevant topics such as market insights, health reform changes and input on future plan designs. We take this opportunity seriously in giving voice to our clients and shaping a more consumer friendly plan. To Empire’s credit, they have been indeed listening and have taken suggestions seriously. New plan options released in the Fall will be examples of this.
For now, however, let’s play some catch-up:
Latest new is that US Court of Appeals has ruled that the Affordable Care Act is constitutional. The ruling is online here. The ruling stated that this is in synch with the commerce clause of interstate commerce. Furthermore, since Congress can force someone to buy health insurance because even if they don’t need insurance today they will at some point in their life. While this ruling is impactful and could influence future rulings, this is expected by many to go to Supreme Court. They have been loudly silent on this touchy topic thus far.
Regardless, this Individual Mandate has little teeth with penalties @ $95 or 1% for 2014, $325 or 2% in 2015 and $695 or 2.5% in 2016. In other words if one can still buy health insurance, face little penalties and no pre-existing condition whats stopping someone form buying insurance when they’re in the hospital?!
To date, many key provisions have already been enacted. Some of those are:
- Extending the age of adult children eligible for coverage under their parents’ health care plan to age 26
- Prohibiting individual and group health plans from placing lifetime limits on the dollar value of coverage
- Preventing health insurers from rescinding coverage (except in cases of fraud)
- Prohibiting health insurers from imposing pre-existing condition exclusions for children
- Mandating coverage for recommended immunizations and preventive care
PPACA items that died in 2011.
1. The non-discrimination provision for Group Health Plans have been delayed. The short answer is that IRS needs more funding to enforce this as well as additional guidance. See blog here
2. 1099 Repeal – See blog here
3. W2 Reporting delayed- the IRS said employers who file fewer than 250 Forms W-2 in 2011 will not be required to report the cost of health care coverage prior to January 2014
Items that have funding delays:
1. Free Choice Voucher Program Takes a Hit- The program would have provided funding of vouchers for lower income employees to subsidize the employer contribution. Under this provision, plan sponsors of employer-based plans (including self-funded benefit plans) would have been required to offer vouchers to employees who fall below a pre-defined income threshold, while the state-based exchanges would credit the employee the amount of the voucher that exceeded their monthly premium.
2. No Health Co-Ops- The goal of the program was to spur the creation of qualified nonprofit health insurance issuers that could offer health plans for individuals and small businesses in states where insurance issuers are licensed to offer them. The program also would have provided loans and grants to fund start-up and maintenance costs for these plans.
This is a bit disappointing as we looked to the highly rated Seattle-based Group Health Cooperative program as a successful at managing costs and offering consumer centric care, click here for more info.
3. Wellness Funding for Small groups- no updates as of yet on the $750 Million funding. This was forward thinking incentives for small groups to afford a a Wellness Program for smoking cessation, diet/nutrition, gym etc. Typically large groups have had these programs as their rates are directly linked to “experience” of their members. In small market the rates are spread over thousands of other small groups. This is a first come first serve funding that we are closely monitoring to help our groups.
We are partnering with Wellness Companies and Health Insurers on establishing a program for small groups. The ROI on this is typically 1.6 :1. If you think your group could benefit please drop us a note at info@medicalsolutionscor.com.
The biggest news really will be the Health Exchanges schedule to open by 2014. NYS in particular than most states has enjoyed 2 rounds of Federal seed capital with almost $30 million for this effort. Each state has to set up an exchange, or marketplace, where small employers and individuals whose employers don’t provide coverage, or who can’t afford the employer plans, can purchase insurance. About 2.7 million New Yorkers are uninsured.
Sponsors say it should also result in one statewide, online, streamlined system for enrolling and renewing enrollment in government-supported Medicaid, Child Health Plus and Family Health Plus programs.
Each state can implement their own version. Several states have rejected funding and do not want to participate in the exchange. By discounting health plan rates based on income its unclear of how much will fall as a state burden?
Florida is one state that has decided not to implement a state health insurance exchange altogether. That state is seeking to shift virtually all of its Medicaid population from government coverage into private plans starting in July 2012.
Two states, Massachusetts and Utah, each have existing state exchanges that differ fundamentally. The Massachusetts exchange is considered an “active purchaser” model, has a large organization and a sizeable budget. The state’s model does not allow all licensed insurers to participate in the exchange. The Utah model, on the other hand, is an “all-comer” model that allows any licensed health insurer to participate. Utah’s exchange initiative is much smaller in scope with only two full-time employees and a limited budget. Currently, the Massachusetts state exchange is suffering major cost overruns.
Rebecca Vesely, writing in Business Insurance, makes this clear in her article describing how two states, Vermont and Florida, are taking strikingly different paths in addressing health care reform. Vermont has taken the first step toward creating a single payer system by 2017. Legislation to set up a five member board to move the state in this direction has already been enacted. And while many details need to be worked out (funding, to name one) and Vermont will need to obtain a waiver from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to put the package together, the state is further down the road to single payer than any other.
With healthcare becoming a hot issue for 2012 both parties are entrenched. Democrats are promoting Medicare as an effective low cost plan that provides insurance for millions of people. The fact that it is imploding is seemingly lost. Republicans, on the other hand, are touting touting free enterprise system but the Medicare Part D law enacted by Bush in 2003 had been under estimated by half! Along with Medicare Advantage plans that have cost the Gov in excess of what was expected.
Rita Redberg, UCF professor of medicine writes an amazing editorial in NYT “Squandering Medicare Money”. While this war of words by both parties goes on no one is really minding the issues. There are things that can be done right now while Washington tries to get its own house in order. An honest appraisal of Medicare Advantage shows that the program doesn’t deserve a fatter payday; it demands a serious crackdown.
Limitations on funding both at the federal and state levels will need to be addressed to avoid a rise in government deficit levels. In the short term, PPACA will continue to face significant political and legal hurdles. Nonetheless, implementation will continue, with more provisions and offices becoming established under the law.
* * * * *
As more information becomes available, MMS Corp is committed to keeping you up-to-date in a timely manner. Coming soon www.medicalsolutionscorp.com to view past Legislative Alerts in the “Newsroom” section. Or, you may visit alexmiller.wordpress.com for blog posts, polls, surveys and numerous resources. If you have any questions, please contact us. Thank you for taking the time to read through this important notification.
