Select Page
Don’t Tax My Workplace Health Plan

Don’t Tax My Workplace Health Plan

Don’t Tax My Workplace Health Plan

Infographic_Employer_Exclusion_Final_160801ISSUE SUMMARY

Don’t Tax My Workplace Health Plan. Congress is currently considering healthcare reform proposals that would eliminate or place a cap on the employer-tax exclusion for health insurance. These proposals would undermine the employer-sponsored health insurance system that provides coverage for more than 175 million Americans. Eliminating the exclusion would eliminate most of the advantages of employer-sponsored insurance, while capping it would degrade the benefit and serve as a tax increase for middle-class Americans.

Lets highlight one particular issue of concern to most of our clients. Today, employers may deduct as a valid business expense the full cost of health insurance and other employee benefits. One of the considerations being discussed would restrict this tax-advantaged status.

The infographic  paints a picture of the importance of job-based health insurance and how valuable it is for employers as well as for American workers and their families.

Impact on American Workers

  • A study by the City University of New York School of Public Health  found that the “Cadillac Tax” will hit the middle class the hardest.
  • A study by the Economic Policy Institute found that because the tax is focused on high premiums, not high levels of coverage, companies that tend to pay higher premiums — such as small businesses and employers with a high proportion of sick workers — could wind up paying the tax even though their benefits are not particularly generous. Also, if employers try to avoid the tax by shifting to less generous plans, workers will likely suffer when it comes to their overall compensation, even if they get a boost in wages to make up for the lost health benefits.
  • The tax will disproportionately affect women, older employees and certain geographic areas. A 2014 report by actuarial and benefits consulting firm Millimani dentified that geography could potentially account for a 69.3% variation in premium. For example, a plan that would cost $9,189 in one area would cost $15,556 elsewhere. The report also demonstrates that the 40% tax’s age and gender adjustment fails to compensate for the impact those factors have on premiums when combined with a high-cost geographic area and/or lower provider discounts.
  • According to a 2014 study by Truven Health Analytics, the 40% tax will result in a cost increase of up to $480 per employee per year for plans that are expected to incur the tax. Early retirees are projected to incur the tax at a much higher rate than active employees, with 81% of such plans likely to trigger the tax.
  • A study by the American Health Policy Institute estimated the 40% tax “could cost 12.1 million employees an average of $1,050 in higher payroll and income taxes per year, if employers increase their taxable wages as they reduce the cost of health care benefits. Alternatively, these employees could see up to a $6,150 reduction in their health care benefits and little or no increase in their pay.”

Impact on Employers

  • An issue brief by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that “a meaningful percentage of employers would need to make changes in their health benefits” to avoid the 40% tax, and this percentage grows significantly over time unless employers are able to keep heath plan cost increases at low levels. In fact, 19 percent of employers already in 2015 have a plan that would exceed the threshold when flexible spending accounts are included in the calculation. These firms would need to reduce their current plan costs over the next several years to avoid the tax. By 2028, 42% of employers would have plans where costs would exceed the threshold for some or all employees. And if health plan premiums continue to grow faster than inflation, as expected, all employers will eventually be affected by the tax.
  • According to Tower-Watson survey48% of employers believe the plans they provide will be affected the first year the law is implemented. And that rises to 82% of employers by 2023, just five years later.
  • The Lockton Companies wrote in a 2015 benefits guidance document, “When we project five and ten years into the future, based on current guidance, the majority of our clients will eventually trigger the tax.”
  • Eventually, the 40% tax will apply to modest plans, not just high-cost coverage as intended. A recent study by actuarial and benefits consulting firm Mercer, found that the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program’s (FEHBP) Blue Cross Blue Shield standard option plan was projected to hit the 40% tax soon after it was originally set to go into effect.
  • A study by the American Bankers Association’s HSA Council found that “If your current HSA-qualified family health plan costs more than $17,000, including wellness programs, your firm is likely to incur excise tax liability in 2018 if anyone makes a maximum contribution.”

Impact on Health Benefits

  • The actuarial and benefits consulting firm Aon Hewitt reported in 2015 that 33% of employers surveyed are increasing deductibles and other cost-sharing, to avoid being on a trajectory to trigger the tax when it goes into effect. But fully 40% of employers expect at least one plan to unavoidably hit the tax threshold regardless.
  • A survey conducted by the National Business Group on Health found that 42% of employers said they will increase employee cost-sharing, and 37% said they will reduce spousal subsidies or implement a surcharge for covering them to minimize the impact of the excise tax.
  • A survey of 700 employers by Mercer in 2015 found that anticipation of the 40% tax is already leading many employers to consider excluding employees’ spouses from their health policies or imposing a surcharge for including them. The survey found that the tax has consistently been the primary concern of employers since passage of the Affordable Care Act.
  • The 40% tax is triggered when the value of an individual’s health plan exceeds the threshold — a supposedly high-end number for “Cadillac” plans. But a 2013 Mercer survey found that the average price of all employer-provided health plans in the state of Florida, for example, was already approaching the threshold — years before the tax is set to go into effect.

Because its thresholds are indexed to general inflation instead of faster-growing medical inflation, more plans will be hit by the tax every year. The tax thresholds are indexed to the Consumer Price Index, which the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates will rise annually by 2.4% on average over the next decade. But the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) projects private health care spending to rise 5.8% on average each year, as health care costs increase significantly faster than general inflation. This insufficient indexing of the thresholds means more and more plans will trigger the tax, and to a greater extent, over time.

Take Action Today:

  • Tell Congress to Oppose Eliminating or Capping the Employer Exclusion – click here
  • Join Fight the Cadillac Tax  – click here.

Contact Us Now    Learn how our Agency is helping buinsesses thrive in today’s economy. Please contact us at info@medicalsolutionscorp.com or (855)667-4621. 

No Tax Restarts

No Tax Restarts

No Tax Restarts

No need to wait till next Jan 1st to make changes.  No tax restarts are good news for PEO prospective groups. Federal Tax Restarts Are No Longer An Issue  The significant added expense of having to pay tax restarts often postponed or ended the PEO conversation for many of our prospective clients. It was an important consideration since companies were not eligible for tax restart credits and the cost of the restarts often diminished the financial value proposition of partnering with a PEO.

Example: A group starting a plan in May would have to pay for annual FICA and FUTA all over again with new PEO. A PEO is considered a different employer group.

Moving forward, there are no federal tax restarts to worry about. FICA and FUTA wage bases will not restart when an employer joins a PEO. Ask us about our Quick Start Program to ensure a smooth start to our personalized PEO model, and offers perks for your staff.

Contact us to learn more about our Quick Start Program on-boarding processs but here are the high points:

  1. You’ll have access to the best healthcare providers, coupled with the pricing that is offered to much larger companies.
  2. Your Worker’s Compensation rate may favorably adjust since you will be “adopted” under the PEO and their typically much better rates.
  3. You’ll have a partner that will help build systems for recruiting, hiring, employee administration and more.
  4. You’ll also have experts who will work with you to establish and maintain policies and programs, including workplace safety, sexual harassment, diversity and others that are typically required by law.

While this certainly is not going to fix everything in the ever growing PEO industry, it’s a huge leap forward and offers clarity. If you would like to explore how a PEO can help your company, contact us and we will be happy to help you.

PEO White Paper

PEO Get Started

Why a Private Exchange?

Why a Private Exchange?

Why a Private Exchange? A Private Exchange Answers These Top 10 Questions.

Why a Private Exchange?

  1. Defined Contribution: I don’t want to get involved in peoples individual health insurance needs. How does the Employer extricate from this very personal and important employee need and yet still offer this benefit? I like the defined contribution similar to a 401k.

 

  1. Tax Advantages: How do I offer the group and employee pre-tax advantages not offered on an individual basis?

 

  1. Group Insurance Upgrade: How do I upgrade from the diminishing individual market and meet strict group underwriting? Rates are higher, smaller networks and lower benefits in this segment.

 

  1. Full Fortune 500 Benefits: How do I offer balanced voluntary benefits similar to a Fortune 500 company? Some employees are asking for group discounted dental, vision, disability, life insurance and supplemental coverage such as AFLAC but we can’t guarantee the minimum participations.

 

  1. Simplify: I don’t have the time needed to make annual plan changes. How do I empower my employees with choice, education and various networks to make their own choices? Many times I’d just rather absorb the 10% increase than deal with the changes.

 

  1. Choice: I have employees all over the Metro area. How can you help me offer more than 1 or 2 health plans as benefits have become more complex and networks increasingly narrow geographic sensitive in nature?

 

  1. Technologies: Can you give me the technologies needed to make this paperless? Do you have a platform that I can use as an intranet communication portal? Can I securely store documents such Employee handbooks and notification?

 

  1. Added Value: Can you offer additional supporting tools aside from technology? Do you have COBRA and section 125 cafeteria documents?

 

  1. HR: Do you have an HR Services for Employers Support? Will you have employee support such as a 24/7 independent CS concierge services?

 

  1. Personalization: Will I have an in person experienced knowledgeable consultant available for support on plan design, metrics, and customer care and employee open enrollment?

 

Is a Private Exchange Right For My Group?

If you’re a small business owner who has concerns about payroll, filing paperwork, and complying with government regulations, co-employment may be the service you’ve been looking for.  In some cases, a Private Exchange may NOT be right for you. With Health Care Reform your company may qualify for a small business tax credit or a be eligible for a large group discount under a PEO.

Try us on a custom demo, contact us at (855)667-4621 .

Resource:

Private Exchange White Papers 

Video Easecentral Benefits Online Enrollment

Empire Strikes Back

Empire Strikes Back

Empire Strikes Back

Empire recently announced that they will be re-entering the New York small groupLawrence Schreiber Pres Empire BlueCross market in 2017. This is welcome news indeed  especially in the NY small group market of 1-100 employees.  Recently, the broad national networks have been diminished to only 2 health insurers, Aetna and Oxford.

There will be upcoming fall webinar in which we will share more about Empire’s new comprehensive product offerings and the ways you can partner together to bring a more valued health care experience to your employees. Please read the full announcement below.

 

We will be significantly expanding our small group products we offer in the New York market. Watch Empire President Larry Schreiber’s video announcement.

January 1, 2017, we will be offering a comprehensive portfolio of products and networks to the New York small group market in our 28-county service area. These additional product offerings will bring employers more choice and access, while providing you with competitive options for these groups.

Empire has participated in the small group market for more than 80 years. But in 2012 we began the process of reducing market share due to a cyclical inability to obtain necessary rate increases on our small group products.

However, a combination of evolving market dynamics has created what we believe is a new opportunity for us to work closely together again in the New York Small Group market. Three of the most influential factors are:

  1. The implementation of the new Risk Adjustment Model. This critical underpinning of the Affordable Care Act compensates health plans on a “net-neutral” basis for obtaining a disproportionate share of unhealthy, below-average risk.
  2. The definition of “Small Group Employer” has changed. As you all know, under the law, small groups have gotten bigger in New York and other states to include employers with up to 100 employees.
  3. Well-publicized carrier changes over the past 12 months have created the need for more options to help balance the Small Group market in New York.

With these in mind, since the start of the year, we have done extensive market research, worked with our regulators at the Department of Financial Services and built new small group market solutions from the ground up to address the unique needs of the New York market.

As you might imagine, this requires a strong combination of pricing, product and network. We are excited by this next chapter.

Stay proactive and contact us today for a customized consult on how your organization can prepare  ahead  for ACA, Benefits, Payroll and HR  @ (855) 667-4621 or info@medicalsolutionscorp.com.

NYS 2017 Rate Requests

NYS 2017 Rate Requests

NYS 2017 Rate Requests

The State released NYS 2017 Rate Requests with average increases of 17.3% individual market and 12% for small groups.  This early 5/12/16 deadline request requirement is not an Obamacare requirement.  As per NY State Law carriers are required to send out notices of rate increase filings to groups and subscribers.   NYS of Health 2017 Rates request

With only 3 months of mature claims in 2016 to work of off Insurance Actuaries have little experience to predict accurate projections. Typically the rate requests must be high and  in the past  final approvals after negotiations were  only  half, see https://medicalsolutionscorp.com/nys-2016-rates-approved/.   The national rate trend, however, has been much higher than in past years due to higher health care costs and the loss of Federal reinsurance fund known as risk reinsurance corridor.

This is one of the reasons why the individual market is significantly more costly to operate than small group as per recent United Healthcare pull out of most State Individual Exchanges, UnitedHealthcare will drop ACA Exchanges.  In fact, the Health Republic NY is Shutting Down highlights how an insurer banked on the federal risk corridor reinsurance and underestimated NYS costs of care.   Another local example is Oscar Health Insurance which has lost $105 million and is asking for up to 30% rate increase.  The 3 year old company  said the increase was necessary because medical costs have risen, government programs that helped cover costs are ending, and its members needed more care than expected. That all translates into the need for a price correction.

Importantly, the individual market subsides may be on borrowed time.  Last week,  The Federal Court ruled that Obamacare subsidies were illegally funded.  The ruling while the Obama administration challenges it in D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, is still allowing the reimbursements to continue for now.  The  practice of  some small businesses dropping group health insuarnce in favor of the Individual Plans known as “cash for insurance” is put into question by this.  While the IRS ruled that this is prohibited (see below) some small business are attracted to the simplicity of a public exchange and not getting involved in the managing of plans.  Prohibited: The IRS prohibits employers from giving (or reimbursing) employees pre-tax funds to buy health insurance on their own—through the state-based and federally facilitated exchanges or private marketplaces alike.1 This practice may result in a $100 per day excise tax per applicable employee, according to an IRS Q&A released in May 2014.2

Instead, the correct approach for a small business in keeping  with simplicity is a Private Exchange.  This is a true defined contribution empowering employees with choice of leading insurers offering paperless technologies integrating HRIS/Benefits/Payroll.  Both employee and employers still gain tax advantage benefits under the business.  Also, the benefits, rates and network size are superior under a group plan as THE RISK OUTLINED ABOVE ARE HIGHER FOR INDIVIDUAL MARKETS THAN SMALL GROUP PLANS.

For more information on how a Private Exchange can help your group please  Contact us at (855)667-4621.

 

Summary of 2017 Requested Rate Actions

INDIVIDUAL MARKET

Company Name 2017 Requested Rate Change
Aetna Life Insurance Company 19.4%
Affinity Health Plan, Inc.* 20.7%
Capital District Physicians’ Health Plan* 11.2%
Crystal Run Health Plan, LLC* 89.1%
Empire HealthChoice HMO, Inc.* 24.0%
Excellus Health Plan, Inc.* 15.9%
Health Insurance Plan of Greater New York* 14.0%
Healthfirst PHSP, Inc.* 6.6%
HealthNow New York Inc.* 6.1%
Independent Health Benefits Corporation* 19.2%
MetroPlus Health Plan, Inc.* 20.3%
MVP Health Plan, Inc.* 6.1%
New York State Catholic Health Plan, Inc. dba Fidelis Care New York* 8.1%
North Shore-LIJ CareConnect Insurance Company, Inc.* 29.2%
Oscar Insurance Corporation* 18.4%
UnitedHealthcare of New York, Inc.* 45.6%
Weighted Average Requested Rate Change – Individual Market 17.3%

*Indicates that the company makes products available on the “New York State of Health” marketplace.

SMALL GROUP MARKET

Company Name 2017 Requested Rate Change
Aetna Life Insurance Company 12.0%
Capital District Physicians’ Health Plan, Inc. 9.6%
CDPHP, Universal Benefits Inc.* 11.6%
Crystal Run Health Insurance Company, Inc. 61.9%
Crystal Run Health Plan, LLC 66.6%
Empire Healthchoice Assur Inc 10.0%
Empire HealthChoice HMO, Inc. 12.6%
Excellus Health Plan, Inc.* 12.3%
Health Insurance Plan of Greater New York* 10.6%
Healthfirst Health Plan (Managed Health) 5.0%
HealthNow New York Inc.* 5.8%
Independent Health Benefits Corporation* 11.2%
MetroPlus Health Plan, Inc.* 13.1%
MVP Health Plan, Inc.* 5.4%
MVP Health Services Corp. 6.8%
North Shore-LIJ CareConnect Insurance Company, Inc.* 16.8%
Oxford Health Insurance, Inc.* 12.9%
UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company of New York 12.8%
Weighted Average Requested Rate Change – Small Group Market 12.0%

*Indicates that the company makes products available on the “New York State of Health” marketplace.

Source:  https://myportal.dfs.ny.gov/web/prior-approval/summary-of-2017-requested-rate-actions
Resource:
What to Expect in 2016 -BrochureCopy
Aftermath of Health Republic Shut Down

Aftermath of Health Republic Shut Down

HRNY ending 2016

Aftermath of Health Republic Shut Down

The article below summarizes  in full the Aftermath of Health Republic Shut Down.  The original NYS announcement to shut down Nov 30th was released on Friday October 30th. There are countless anecdotal evidence of our client’s Providers not getting paid for work already done this Fall.  Brokers , our Agency included, has NOT been paid  since this Summer.

Should My Doctor and Broker be paid? That really ought to be the header for this article. At the same time Health Providers and Brokers honored clients despite the Health Republic’s precarious financial status.  The approximate amount owed is $150 Million. If the State truly wants to correct this they have a $1Billion surplus. How can the State obligate Providers and Brokers to meet contractual licensing  & professional standards and ignore them now?

 

As reported in Mahopac NY News 12/9/15 by BRETT FREEMAN

Doctors, Insurance Brokers Could Lose Millions After Health Republic’s Collapse

HUDSON VALLEY, N.Y. – When Health Republic Insurance of New York announced early last month that they were ceasing operations at the end of November, individual subscribers and small groups had to scramble for other options to keep themselves and their employees insured.

Doctors and individual insurance brokers weren’t so lucky.

Often overlooked in news reports is how Health Republic’s demise affected thousands of medical providers and individual insurance brokers, who may never see a dime from all that is owed to them.

Sign Up for E-News

Health Republic was a not-for-profit health insurance co-op (Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan) established under the Affordable Care Act. According to its website, at its height, it had over 215,000 members, making it the largest new health insurance cooperative in the country.

According to articles linked on Health Republic’s website, it borrowed a $265 million low-interest federal loan to begin its operations and was one of 23 co-ops receiving a total of $2.4 billion. According to reports, about half of them have since failed, with many analyses pointing to the low premiums as the cause of their collapse.

Dr. Scott D. Hayworth, president and CEO of the Mount Kisco Medical Group (MKMG), estimates that his practice, which provides medical care to 500,000 patients in the Hudson Valley (including thousands of patients in Mahopac, Somers, Yorktown and North Salem), has lost millions of dollars due to the collapse of Health Republic.

“It’s more than just the doctors’ fees,” said Hayworth, who oversees 450 physicians in dozens of locations throughout the Hudson Valley. Dr. Hayworth said that insurance reimbursements cover vaccines, chemotherapy and other ambulatory and pharmaceutical products that were paid for out of pocket by MKMG.

Despite its losses, MKMG continued to honor its contract with the insurance carrier to ensure any patients covered by Health Republic would continue to receive medical care.

“The thing we all have to remember is there is a patient in the middle of this,” Hayworth said. “Our first obligation is to our patients.”

Other health care providers, including local hospitals, have been in the same boat as MKMG.

Putnam Hospital Center is owed $1.8 million, according to Marcela Rojas, the manager of public and community affairs. Health Quest, which is the parent company of Putnam Hospital Center, is owed $4.4 million in total and doctors throughout its three hospitals are owed $350,000.

“In meetings with state officials, a discussion has focused on how to recoup any of these payments owed to individual patients as well as hospitals, physicians and other providers,” Rojas said in an email interview this past Friday. “There is a discussion on restructuring Health Republic, but the question is, what assets, if any, remain? Recouping any funds may be both a federal and state matter. There is currently no guarantee, emergency or recovery fund in Washington or Albany to cover those losses. Hospitals are meeting with state legislators this week to discuss how best to proceed to recoup at least some of the money owed.”

Officials at Northern Westchester Hospital estimate that they will be owed $2 million due to nonpayment of services provided to Health Republic patients.

“We believe NWH will recover some unknown portion of that amount,” said Joel Seligman, president and CEO of Northern Westchester Hospital. “Under New York State law, NWH must continue to provide services to patients for 60 days where continuity and transitions of care are an issue. Northern Westchester Hospital has a robust financial assistance policy applicable to all patients, including former Health Republic patients.”

All of these healthcare providers are receiving guidance and advocacy from the Healthcare Association of New York State (HANYS), a non-profit statewide association representing hospitals, health systems, nursing homes, home care agencies and other providers across the state.

In an interview, Melissa Mansfield, associate director of public and media relations for HANYS, explained that other states have something called a guarantee fund, which operates as an insurance company for the insurance company.

“New York is one of the few that does not have one yet,” she said, adding that medical providers statewide are owed $160 million, not including what will be owed for care rendered during the month of November.

“HANYS is aggressively advocating on behalf of our members with Cuomo administration officials and CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) to secure payment for money owed by Health Republic,” Mansfield said. “HANYS is exploring all available options for immediate payment and pursuing the establishment of a guarantee fund as a way to protect providers for Health Republic claims and from future insolvencies. Our members are obviously concerned about the impact Health Republic’s shutdown has had on patients and are committed to providing care during this transition. However, HANYS continues to raise very serious concerns about the consequences of such a tremendous financial loss when hospitals are already financially fragile.”

In Putnam County, there were 4,241 Health Republic enrollees, according to HANYS. In Westchester County, there were 20,404 enrollees, making it the third-most impacted county in the state, behind Nassau and Suffolk counties.

In a recent interview, state Sen. Terrence Murphy, who represents Mahopac, Somers, Yorktown and North Salem, among other communities, expressed outrage at the collapse of Health Republic, calling it, “at a minimum, gross mismanagement and negligence. Where the hell was DFS?” Murphy asked, referring to the Department of Financial Services, the state agency that oversees various industries that operate in the state, including all insurance companies. Murphy said DFS should be investigated.

On Sept. 25, DFS directed Health Republic to cease writing new health insurance policies and announced that the co-op would commence an orderly wind down after the expiration of its existing policies. Weeks later, after a review of Health Republic’s finances, finding it in worse financial condition than the company previously reported in its filings, DFS and New York State of Health, which is the official agency administering the Affordable Care Act, ordered Health Republic to end all of its policies on Nov. 30.

A spokesman for DFS did not return a phone call seeking comment, but on its website, officials with DFS said they opened an official investigation last week on Health Republic’s inaccurate financial reporting.

“NYDFS investigators are collecting and reviewing evidence relating to Health Republic’s substantial underreporting to NYDFS of its financial obligations,” according to the statement. “Among other issues, the investigation will examine the causes of the inaccurate representations to NYDFS regarding the company’s financial condition.”

According to DFS, medical providers who contracted with Health Republic had been legally bound to provide healthcare through the expiration of a patient’s plan with Health Republic, regardless of their concerns about reimbursement.

“NYDFS is taking actions that will apply a New York State law that prohibits providers from collecting or attempting to collect from Health Republic consumers amounts that are owed by Health Republic,” a statement on the website said. In addition, according to the DFS website, doctors must honor all new insurance policies of patients who are in an ongoing course of treatment with a provider for a life-threatening or a degenerative and disabling condition or disease, or in the second or third trimester of pregnancy for up to 60 days or through the pregnancy.

All of this is good for the patients, but Murphy expressed worry about how some local doctors might fare with all the lost reimbursements.

“You have practices that might go belly up,” said Murphy, who is a chiropractor in addition to being a legislator. “This is going to be a disaster…You will see some of them go out of business.”

While Dr. Hayworth at MKMG expressed confidence that his medical group would continue to offer top-notch care for its patients, he said that healthcare is a narrow-margin business and lost reimbursements will affect his group’s ability to recruit the best and brightest physicians, who he fears might be lured to other states.

Hayworth, who is married to former Congresswoman Nan Hayworth, declined to comment on the politics of the Affordable Care Act, but he said there definitely needs to be insurance reform. He also called on Albany and Washington, D.C. to provide “legislative relief” to the medical providers impacted by Health Republic’s collapse.

Sen. Murphy, who is chairman of the Administrative Regulations Review Commission, said he respects the legislative process, which calls for other committees to work on the problem, but has shared his concerns with state Sen. Kemp Hannon, chair of the Health Committee, who has started up round table discussions to determine the next steps.

“Anything to make sure this never happens again,” Murphy said.

Assemblyman David Buchwald, who represents North Salem, is also working on the problem.

“I have heard from constituents who are doctors and are concerned that they will not be paid for the services they provided to Health Republic patients,” Buchwald said in statement. “I have worked to raise this issue in Albany while the legislature is not in session. Understandably, the most immediate concern is ensuring that people who had Health Republic insurance are transitioned as smoothly as possible to new insurance. This is important to both patients and doctors, so that at least people are insured and health providers get paid going forward. Next, New York will hopefully see to it that insurance companies have adequate financial resources and address the needs of health professionals who have been left holding the bag. I expect that work to begin as soon as Health Republic customers are transitioned to their new insurance.”

Assemblyman Steve Katz, who represents Mahopac, Somers and Yorktown, did not return a call seeking comment. Nor did Congressman Sean Patrick Maloney, who represents Mahopac, Somers and North Salem in the U.S. House of Representatives, and Congresswoman Nita Lowey, who represents Yorktown.

In addition to the health care providers, local brokers are also out of luck. Mahopac resident Robert Simone, a broker with INS Brokers Inc., said he is owed thousands of dollars from Health Republic for his September and October commissions.

In an attempt to recoup his commissions, he called Health Republic, which told him to call DFS.

“DFS said, ‘We have nothing to do with it. Health Republic is holding your money.” Simone said he is not optimistic.

Nor is Chris Radding, one of the owners of the Forbes Agency in Katonah. Radding said he had 22 employer groups who had been members of Health Republic and he had lost thousands of dollars in commissions when Health Republic folded.

“Anything I’ve seen, there is no mention of the broker,” Radding said. Both Radding and Simone emphasized that their priority was ensuring that their clients had health coverage.

“The whole thing is pretty frustrating and really kind of disgusting,” Radding said.

In a press release issued Monday, the New York State Association of Health Underwriters estimated that insurance brokers in New York State will have lost millions of dollars due to unpaid commissions.

“What’s needed is a solution that avoids the usual outcomes of a failed insurance carrier,” the release said. It listed the usual outcome as reduced payments or no payments to those who provided their professional services even after the carrier ceased reimbursement for those services. It also said the solution should not inflate future insurance premiums or increase New York residents’ tax burden.

“We think that we have such a solution,” the release said. “NYS recently announced the existence of a $1 billion surplus, $680 million of which was generated by penalties levied by DFS. New York State should use some of that surplus to pay everyone what they are owed—doctors, hospitals and insurance brokers—and NYS should also ensure that Health Republic enrollees who have selected a licensed insurance advisor will continue to benefit from their advice by directing succeeding carriers to automatically appoint those brokers when their clients accept an auto-enrollment offer.”